The Presidency has said it would have reacted to the case of embattled the Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Isa Pantami, differently if he had forged his certificate like a former Minister of Finance, Kemi Adeosun, allegedly did.
WuzupNigeria reports that there had been calls for Pantami to resign his appointment after some past videos of him expressing support for international terrorist organisations in some of his sermons. Following his refusal to heed the call, the pressure switched to the President, Major General Muhammadu Buhari (retd.), to sack Pantami.
On Thursday, the presidency sided with Pantami, insisting that persons who were opposed to the reforms in the ICT sector being championed by Pantami were behind the campaign.
However, some Nigerians on social media said it was ironic that ex-Minister, Adeosun, who was accused of forging her National Youth Service Corps certificate was never supported by the President until she finally caved in to pressure to resign.
However, the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, Garba Shehu, when he appeared on Channels Television’s ‘Politics Today’ programme on Friday, said the crime of alleged certificate forgery involving Adeosun is different from the extremist views of Pantami.
Responding to a question, Shehu said the Presidency’s response “would have been different” if Pantami had forged his certificate like Adeosun did.
“In the second case which is that of Pantami, you are probing the thoughts, what is called ‘McCarthyism’; you search the inner recesses of the minds of individuals, bring out things they have said, or they are about to say, or you think they would say, and use that against them.
“If Pantami had forged a certificate before coming into office, the attitude (of the presidency) would have been different,” he added.
He also lambasted those who had rejected Pantami’s apology, describing them as intolerant.
“Those people who stand in criticism of a man who has said he had wronged society, he has apologised and changed, and they are not willing to forgive him to move on, they are the ones who are the problem. They are the ones who are deeply intolerant,” Shehu said.
